These two properties closed within $300,000 of each other a day apart. Table 1 contains selected data from the purchase, build and sales of the properties.
If I assume no change in the land values, the two properties sold around +/- $310/sqft plus the original land cost. Its a safe bet that the land values dropped.
If I take a different tack and assume a $350/sqft price (and assume lower level finished space sells for half of above grade living area), the land value for Hillside and Riversville drop to $1.52ml and $1.64ml respectively, or -23% and -9% of purchase price. It seems odd that the Riversville land would decline less than the Hillside property. But maybe the nearly 5 1/2 acres at Riversville buoyed the price, because I don't think the house did.
'
I consider the layout and configuration of the Riversville house poor to middling--shallow room depth on main floor; confusing and inefficient space layout in master; non-practical/functional elements--a fireplace in master bedroom seems to be inches from what looked like the only place the master bed could go. Greenwich has enough hot heads without builders trying to create more. Hillside is better designed and built structure, while Riversville has better piece of land.
Table 2.
Another point of interest, at least to me, and contributing factor to sale price is that the list agent for Riversville was not local and she represented both sides of the sale. In Greenwich Non-local agents frequently bring buyers who overpay for property. Second, if an agent represents both sides of a sale, there is always a chance that the property owner will get a discount on RE commision and net greater proceeds.
